Bajaj Pulsar P150 price in Kolhapur

1. Buying Experience not up to the mark. Extra fittings are not available with them.
2. Riding Experience is superb, You feel like it's a Monster.
3. Looks & Performance is superb. Pickup rate @5
4. Service cost is too high. as you are aware of Bajaj.
5. Mileage is 1st priority offering 60 kmpl in the city.
cons: back saree guard not available.
Extra fittings are also not available in the market.
Bike automatically off sometimes
pros: superb mileage 60 in the city.
Nice Projector Head Lamp
Feel like a Monster.
SS Fuel Tank.
Side stand auto off
Kick Start.
Family seating

About the Reviewer

Riding is easy and more comfortable than many bikes. The bike feels light. The bike's pricing is a little on the expensive side.
I got the "single disc" variant so my mother can sit and it has left the footrest. I would recommend the Dual disc variant.
The bike is smooth and gear shifting is very lighter. Very good for traffic riding.
A minor error in the speedometer, it shows more distance on the ODA than actually covered.
Mileage is near 49kmpl in traffic conditions, but if the bike runs in upper RPMs then 45kmpl is expected.
Since Bajaj is known for bad servicing I was worried while buying the bike but I didn't face any issue with it. It changes from place to place.
My first service consisted of
oil change
Teflon coat
Foam wash, Chain cleaning, and lubing
Cost me 2300Rs.
The only drawback which is very important is the bike seems to have a weak frame. While riding with a pillion even small speed breakers give those annoying sounds '.
Other small issues like
--Slimmer rear tire
--No mudguard(tyre) hugger
--No rear side disc break takes a lot of time stopping.

About the Reviewer

Riding handling is good for city rides, but I've not experienced any improved performance after the finishing of the first service. The best part is the projector lamp and the cons are wheel/tyre size is very small compared to similar bikes & side sitting for ladies is not comfortable, a little bit of length seat could have been better for that.

About the Reviewer