User Review of X by Mustakim Sk
2.8/5
3 Reviews
14 Ratings
Price is much higher
38 weeks ago
Mustakim Sk
Rating Parameters
(out of 5)
Visual Appeal
Reliability
Comfort
Service Experience
Value for Money
About the Reviewer
Used it for | Everything |
Owned for | Never owned |
Not interested in purchasing it because the price is too highDon't know about riding experienceThe look is just awesomeMaintenance charges are much more expensive in comparison to other EV scootyPrice too muchLooks goodAccording to the price, the features are very lowSimply don't purchase this scootyIf anyone is purchasing that means they are just wasting their money
Tips for TVS X
Don't buy
Explore TVS Scooters
Find out the list of available TVS Scooters.
More Reviews on X
- Most Helpful (2)
- Most Recent (2)
- Critical (2)
- Positive (0)
Not worth the price
38 weeks ago
Pannag
This has not been released yet so obviously this is on its spec on paper. Paying 2.8L for this electric scooter makes no sense. It has terrible looks from the front.There is no unique feature marketed by the company. For the price of one, you can get 2 scooters or OLA or Ather and still save money.I feel TVS should have first focused on land grabbing with all the buildup on its launch. Hoping TVS has more surprises on this to justify the price
Rating Parameters
(out of 5)
3Visual Appeal
3Reliability
3Comfort
3Service Experience
1Value for Money
About the Reviewer
Used it for
Everything
Owned for
Never owned
Read MoreWas this review helpful?
13
7
Rich boys toy
38 weeks ago
Disappointedcustomer
I have waited for this scooter for a year. The pricing is insane. Who would throw away 2.75 L (On road) for an electric bike whose life is only 8-10 years? Even if we ignore this fact, look at the features it offers. 140 Km riding range. Ola gives this range for a much cheaper price. The way the iPhone changed the industry, if this scooter had come with 500-1000 km as the riding range then it would have made sense. Or if the scooter charged up in 10 mins that would also have made a little sense. But offering fewer features than rivals and quoting obnoxious prices is ridiculous.
Rating Parameters
(out of 5)
5Visual Appeal
3Reliability
3Comfort
3Service Experience
2Value for Money
About the Reviewer
Used it for
Everything
Owned for
Never owned
Tips for other riders
Buy some other bike.
Read MoreWas this review helpful?
31
6
Not worth the price
38 weeks ago
Pannag
This has not been released yet so obviously this is on its spec on paper. Paying 2.8L for this electric scooter makes no sense. It has terrible looks from the front.There is no unique feature marketed by the company. For the price of one, you can get 2 scooters or OLA or Ather and still save money.I feel TVS should have first focused on land grabbing with all the buildup on its launch. Hoping TVS has more surprises on this to justify the price
Rating Parameters
(out of 5)
3Visual Appeal
3Reliability
3Comfort
3Service Experience
1Value for Money
About the Reviewer
Used it for
Everything
Owned for
Never owned
Read MoreWas this review helpful?
13
7
Rich boys toy
38 weeks ago
Disappointedcustomer
I have waited for this scooter for a year. The pricing is insane. Who would throw away 2.75 L (On road) for an electric bike whose life is only 8-10 years? Even if we ignore this fact, look at the features it offers. 140 Km riding range. Ola gives this range for a much cheaper price. The way the iPhone changed the industry, if this scooter had come with 500-1000 km as the riding range then it would have made sense. Or if the scooter charged up in 10 mins that would also have made a little sense. But offering fewer features than rivals and quoting obnoxious prices is ridiculous.
Rating Parameters
(out of 5)
5Visual Appeal
3Reliability
3Comfort
3Service Experience
2Value for Money
About the Reviewer
Used it for
Everything
Owned for
Never owned
Tips for other riders
Buy some other bike.
Read MoreWas this review helpful?
31
6
Not worth the price
38 weeks ago
Pannag
This has not been released yet so obviously this is on its spec on paper. Paying 2.8L for this electric scooter makes no sense. It has terrible looks from the front.There is no unique feature marketed by the company. For the price of one, you can get 2 scooters or OLA or Ather and still save money.I feel TVS should have first focused on land grabbing with all the buildup on its launch. Hoping TVS has more surprises on this to justify the price
Rating Parameters
(out of 5)
3Visual Appeal
3Reliability
3Comfort
3Service Experience
1Value for Money
About the Reviewer
Used it for
Everything
Owned for
Never owned
Read MoreWas this review helpful?
13
7
Rich boys toy
38 weeks ago
Disappointedcustomer
I have waited for this scooter for a year. The pricing is insane. Who would throw away 2.75 L (On road) for an electric bike whose life is only 8-10 years? Even if we ignore this fact, look at the features it offers. 140 Km riding range. Ola gives this range for a much cheaper price. The way the iPhone changed the industry, if this scooter had come with 500-1000 km as the riding range then it would have made sense. Or if the scooter charged up in 10 mins that would also have made a little sense. But offering fewer features than rivals and quoting obnoxious prices is ridiculous.
Rating Parameters
(out of 5)
5Visual Appeal
3Reliability
3Comfort
3Service Experience
2Value for Money
About the Reviewer
Used it for
Everything
Owned for
Never owned
Tips for other riders
Buy some other bike.
Read MoreWas this review helpful?
31
6
There are no positive reviews for this bike
