Honda CB Twister User Reviews

Style so so good for an 110 cc bike

engine performance, fuel economy and gearbox

if any one tell worst about honda petrol engine he is mad or innocent and my review about style is so super and overall performance is amazing,fuel economy is city=58 and highway=68(50 km speed) gear box is super for youngsters but it does not liked by aged above 35

ride quality & handling

twister having superior ride quality and handling is extra ordinary

final words

my bike equipped with drum brakes(both front and rear), braking is so super wheels did not skid if we brake in 50 km suddenly

areas of improvement

no twister didnt need any improvements

pros

style,mileage etc

cons

fuel tank capacity is 8 liters

Style

great style and looks are awesome. Sporty looks for sporty riders.

Engine performance, fuel economy and gearbox

great performance with 109 cc, with power of 9bhp, great milage of 75 kmpl. It has 4 strok engine with 4 speed gear box.

Ride quality & handling

riding quality of this bike is awesome and handling is terific on off road ride. It can stop with the normal drum bike at a speed of 45 km.

Final words

this bike in the 100 cc segment is very cool and i thing customer would by this bike rather than going for other brands in this segment. The honda team has come out with brilliant bikes like twister and have understood the taste and preperfernce of the indinan customer and it is emerging the its market with its performance, the technology and its features.

Areas of improvement

i thing the honda should have increased its fuel capacity and should have improved the speedometer of the bike. I.E should have given some stylish looks in the speedometer.

Pros

comfortable seats, great performance, nice handling

cons

fuel capacity and cost and availability of spare parts outside the honda service center

Even honda regeret how they have mistaken by launching this bike.

Ride: will take u down on road any time above 40km/hr.

Fueleconomy: very less as commited by honda hardly 54kml

spare parts: need to be changed at regular interval very cheap product used to cut down its price.

Exp: used around 19000 km very bad exp.

Tyre: so much thin, even small ups down will throw u from bike. Nothing good about bike to write other than its price but at thhis price too much option available.

Pros

looks

cons

ride,part need to be change at regular interval

Style best in looks & style as compared to any other naked bike under 150cc segment. In my opinion, it even looks better than pulser 135.

Engine performance, fuel economy and gearbox no one can match honda in engine quality. Gearbox is hectic in 1st gear, but there after it gives smooth ride. I had touched 115 km/hr on highways. Some ppl dosent believe me. So i have ridden 110km/hr with a pillion, just to show the top speed.

Ride quality & handling riding is good only in city cond. On highways, it is quite dangerous as if a fast moving truck/bus passes close to u...You could end up crashing due to its light weight.

I changed the rear tyre to 100/80-17 after 10000 kms, which enhanced my handelling by alomost 50%.

Final words nice bike. But dont expect good fuel economy. I got 51-54 kmpl in first 10-12000 kms. Then 48-50 kmpl. And finally getting 44-45 kmpl now. I ride b/w 45-55 kmpl but still it doesnt provide legitimate economy. Company mechanics says, it gives 57-58 kmpl...But never got that.

Areas of improvement change of rear tyre to a bigger one. Adjustment in gear box, reducing the cost of spare parts.. Front mudguard costs rs900/, chainset for almost rs1500/-(could get original 2 chain sets of pulser 150), etc.

Pros

looks, styling, riding position

cons

fuel economy, spare parts are too costly,